“The
problem is, many of the people in need of saving are in churches, and
at least part of what they need saving from is the idea that God sees
the world the same way they do.”
-Barbara
Brown Taylor
I think the
conservative element, especially among Evangelicals, are much too
enamored with Dr. Ben Carson. While I am most certainly pro-life and
hold other conservative values which would, no doubt, line up with
many of Carson's positions I have a few things “against him” so
to speak.
Carson got into
trouble recently speaking about gun control and applying it to the
Holocaust, stating, in a nutshell, if the Jews had more guns and had
not been under oppressive gun laws implemented by the Hitler regime
they could have fought back more effectively. So the Holocaust would
have been less likely if there were more guns?
This not only sounds
absolutely stupid and slightly crazy to me but many others. Even the
ADL, “Anti-Defamation League” has spoken out against this view.
Let's be clear, this is all hypothetical that we're speaking of but
Carson is no historian and he's treading on a dangerous hypothetical
scenario that not only makes him look ignorant but also a little
crazy.
I'm not anti-gun,
far from it, but giving everybody more guns is not the answer we need
now and it's not the answer that was needed years ago. Dr. Carson
thinks that by explaining, in hypothetical “what I would do”
scenarios he is expanding on what his policy would be but he isn't.
He's painting himself into a corner with words which he won't be able
to get out of, and we have another example besides the Holocaust
quip.
When asked about a
recent school shooting Dr. Carson suggested that if he were in that
same scenario he would have “rushed the shooter” banking on the
fact that the shooter can't shoot all of us, they can only shoot one
person at a time. In other words he would fight back. How patently
absurd, how callous this is to the victims. It almost shames them,
implying that maybe they would be alive if they had just acted
differently. He doesn't come right out and say that but that's what
is implied.
Who really knows
what they would do in any given situation? You can say, “I would
do this...” all day long but you really have no idea how you will
react when something terrifying happens, when adrenaline kicks in and
something tragic is in full swing you don't always pick some noble or
brilliant course of action. Many times, I would wager, when people
are faced with life or death, they simply try and cling to life as
much as possible and don't make bold, saucy moves. This isn't the
movies and true heroes are hard to come by in that regard.
So who would I vote
for? Strike up a conversation with me and I might tell you...and I
won't even give you a hypothetical...
No comments:
Post a Comment